Welcome to my blogspot. This website is created in 2011 for the aims to enlighten people with good human values, and, to propagate my original ideas and knowledge about the nature and life. Some of my philosophy and thoughts by origin are as follows:
1. The “X” Killed the Dinosaurs (1990)....
5. The Supernova of the Sun and Its Quench within Million Years (1994)...
7. There Was No Big Bang (1995).
8. Inter-star and Inter-galaxy Travels By “M” Jumps (1996)......
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Sub-Theories of Concengation Theory
Sub-theory No.
8 (31/8/2016)
When a
smaller
star, more quenched or dying, or a
planet or a moon is migrating to the host star which is also in
quenching state in this case, its materials spew into the host star, thus
rekindles it like a young
star, there is no
such thing as new
star forming in
the universe at our
galaxy's time.
Sub-theory
No.
9 (31/8/2016)
For Jupiter, its
inner core plus outer core has a
total radius of 15000 km and
mean density about 10 g/cm^3, for its mantle from
15000 km to 60000 km has a mean density of 1.1 g/cm^3, for the terrestrial
crust land from 60000
km to 65000 km has a mean density of about 3.0
g/cm^3,
for the atmosphere from 65000 km to about 70000 km has a mean density of about
0.1 g/cm^3, the radii and densities can be varied accordingly to fit the
theory, it only needs a
density of 1.8 g/cm^3 for terrestrial moons, yeah! Jupiter
terrestrial planet is going to be true.
Sub-theory No.
10 (1/9/2016)
Like all stars,
the sun, all planets
and all
spherical moons,
Ceres has a solid
magnetic core.
Sub-theory No.
11 (1/9/2016)
Similar to
those on the Moon, other planets and moons, smaller
but conspicuous
craters are seen over the larger craters with obscure rims, because different scales of
bombardments were taken place at different time frames during the terrestrial transforming from molten state into completely solid state.
Sub-theory No.
12 (1/9/2016)
There are
three factors to explain ice
caps formed at the north and south poles, other than the cooling effect due to
the absence
of solar heat
during winters, another reason also apply for the distant Pluto is that the gaseous vapourwas
deposited there because of lower rotational speed.
Sub-theory No.
13 (1/9/2016)
During the
proto-star
stage of the moons, planets and stars and
sun, solid
magnetic core
already existed, it played the function to spin the moon
or planet, and thus shaping it into a round structure.
Sub-theory No.
14 (2/9/2016)
After transformation
from a little
proto-star into
a pre-planet, its spinning solid core has generated sufficient out-going force
to push a mini
semi-solid gob which
punched through the solidifying crust of Ceres,
and eventually resulted this mountain
Ahuna Mons.
Sub-theory No.
15 (2/9/2016)
There are
two possible sources for semi-solid gobs, first, from an asteroid either self-derived or an outsource
from other pre-planets, which struck the Ceres pre-planet and penetrated through the semi-solid
molten crust, and then subjected to the out-pushing force induced by the
spinning solid core.
Sub-theory No.
16 (2/9/2016)
During the
cooling process of the Ceres
pre-planet, there was a great fireworks show,
many thousands of gobs of various sizes in the deeper mantle had been flung outward, and sent into the outside space, same
things happen on the Sun presently, however, the Ahuna Mons gob missed
the launch(ed),
it was trapped in the solidifying crust. (this is the
evidence!! There are many sub-theories related to this one about the Sun,
planets and moons).
Sub-theory No.
17 (3/9/2016)
The Jupiter's polar atmosphere thickness is less than 2000 km, the
equatorial atmosphere is about 5000 km thicker, the atmospheric bulging is a result of its high-speed terrestrial rotation, which is causing gases hurling towards
the equatorial region.
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Sub-Theories of Concengation Theory
Sub-theory No.
1 (25/8/2016)
The sun,
and all solar system planets including the earth, jupiter
and saturn, and spherical moons as well, were proto-stars of various mass sizes during their early
stage of development. Towards the end
of their proto-star stage, fusion
of hydrogen had
occurred, followed by nucleosyntheses of various heavier elements, and then
proceeded to formation of all kinds of heavy elements. Due to smaller masses, planets and moons
were cooled down earlier and faster, forming the terrestrial
made up of all kinds of natural elements.
Sub-theory No.
2 (25/8/2016)
The precursor
proto-stars of planets such as saturn and jupiter
were isolated
planetary systems that
were hosting a number of proto-planets, they were considered nearby within 1-2
light-year distance from the sun.
Sub-theory No.
3 (25/8/2016)
Since the
Saturnand
Jupiter proto-stars have smaller masses, their fuel elements
were consumed earlier and formed heavy elements earlier than the bigger sun, as
they were cooling
down their magnetic core and thus magnetic field intensified, which partly explains their migration toward the sun, and eventually captured by the sun.
Sub-theory
No. 4
(27/8/2016)
All jupiter-like
planets are like Saturn, Jupiterand Earth, all
are terrestrials,
made up of various kinds of elements, there is no such
thing as gas giant in
the universe, spherical gas giant is a misconception.
Sub-theory No.
5 (25/8/2016)
There are
many
craters on the Jupiter surface, created by asteroids and moons
bombardment.
Sub-theory No.
6 (25/8/2016)
The great red spot and other smaller red spots are residues of a moon and large asteroids that have struck on
the Jupiter.
Sub-theory No.
7 (25/8/2016)
The Jupiter
is made up of various
elements, not that close to 90% hydrogen
and 10% helium.
Doubt 1. If MH17 was shot down, why
there was no trail of smoke in the sky
before it crashed on the ground?
疑点1.如果MH17是被击落, 为什么在它坠地之前空中没有烟迹呢?
Doubt 2. If it was shot at 10 km or
33,000 feet in the air, why it did not explode and burn high in the air, but exploded only when it touched the ground?
Doubt 3. If the Ukraine denied,
pro-Russia separatists denied, and the Russia also denied, then the
investigation could consider, what is the possibility of malfunction incidence
of the aircraft?
Doubt 4. According to a media source, the tracked location of MH17 in the western Ukraine
airspace was at 12:11 GMT (8:11 EDT), the crash at Grabovo (east of Donetsk) on
the eastern side of Ukraine was at 13:21 GMT, the distance between these two locations is close to 1000
km, is it confirmed nothing unusual
happen during this stretch of travelling?
Doubt 5. MH17 is relatively a quite old jet, 17 years old, its maintenance service must have been extremely stringent. You must believe it, otherwise who will believe it?
Doubt 6. According to Daily Mail, MH17 was diverted further to the north, is it true? Why should the pilots do that? If it happened, could the diversion have been done more than hundred kilometres away before crash? 疑点6.根据每日邮报, MH17有向北偏离, 这是真的吗? 机师们为何要那样做呢? 如果它有发生, 偏离有可能在坠落之前超过数百公里之外就做的吧?
21 July 2014 (2014年7月21日)
Doubt 7. Can you imagine how strange is
the coincidence of the number 17? A
Boeing 777 aircraft, with its maiden flight on 17-7-1997, after 17 years, when used
for the flight MH17, on the same day 17-7-2014, said to be shot by missile and crashed near the eastern border of
Ukraine. For such kind of incidence, natural chances could be as low as to 1 out of a trillion, only purposeful
human factor then only it could be larger than 1 out of 100.
Doubt 8. 17-7-2014 is considered the
17th anniversary day of the aircraft, when it was said to be shot in the air,
what was happening in the aircraft? You may think there was not a celebration
during tea time onboard, but other people
are free to spare imagination to think their ways. Whatever it was or it was
not, the end result was a tragedy already
happened.
Doubt
9. It has been reported that Ukraine people
saw debris and body falling from the cloudy sky. It was a cloudy day, how would
it affect a missile to strike its target?
Certainly it needs high precision equipment and well planned
coordination, including use of radar and
satellite, how much is the precision of a surface missile shooting at an
aircraft moving fast above clouds?
Doubt 10. In one media report, showing
an image and claiming the left wing of an aircraft was caught in flame, it was
thought to be MH17. But the background looks so clear and brightly blue,
suggesting the image was photographed upward from ground, but the time of incident
was a cloudy day, so unlikely it is a true image of MH17.
Doubt 11. In a media report: “Russian
Defense Ministry said on Monday (21 July), the crashed Malaysia Airlines flight
MH17 had strayed 14 km north from its planned route after passing Ukraine’s
eastern city of Donetsk”. If it was true, you must realize that the cause of
straying may not necessary occur after shot by a missile, it also could be due
to weather or other incidents.
Doubt 12. The information is still
unclear, “straying” certainly could mean it was
diverting from its normal flight state, but in this case, it is uncertain whether
it was during “downing” or while still high in the sky. At the speed of about
900 km/h, moving 14 km means about 1 minute, if the aircraft was straying for 1
minute, followed by free fall, then it would be a different explanation.
Doubt 13. If the aircraft was struck by
a missile at a the height of 10-km
altitude, followed by straying 14 km, then fell to crash, the debris and
other falling objects could scatter even 20 km away from the crash site, if
other falling objects such as emergency door could be found far away then it
might not be explainable by missile theory.
Doubt 14. On 22 July, 282 bodies have
been said recovered, where are
the other 16? However, another report on 23 July: “Dutch forensic officials say
only 200 bodies out of 298 MH17 victims have been found so far, not some 280 as
previously reported”. If the head count is not tallied, certainly some more are
still within or around the crash site or beyond, if one could be found much
farther, the missile theory would be revised.
Doubt
15. Malaysia
Airlines released a statement on 18 July: “Malaysia Airlines confirms it
received notification from Ukrainian ATC that it had lost contact with flight
MH17 at 1415 (GMT) at 30 km from Tamak waypoint, approximately 50 km from the
Russia-Ukraine border”. The time was then corrected to be officially 13:15 GMT
(local time 4:15 pm or 16:15), but if MAS adopted the Moscow (about same
longitude) summer time, it was GMT+4 hours, that is 17:15 or 5:15 pm local
time. Minutes before it crashed, it is curious what happen to it at about 17
o’clock. Is the “17” still a coincidence?
Doubt 16. The aircraft Boeing 777-200ER
registration as 9M-MRD, with its maiden flight on 17-7-1997, after 17 years,
when used for the MAS flight as MH17, on the same day 17-7-2014, at about 17
o’clock (local time zone near Russia border), it should be a good time of
“happy birthday”, but why was it so ill-fated to be the target of tragedy?
Doubt 17. As given in Malaysia
Airlines’ statement on 18 July, the Ukrainian ATC had lost contact with flight
MH17 at 13:15 (corrected GMT), but the time of crash on ground was reported as
13:21 by some media, are these two times truly accurate? If there was 6 minutes
lag time from lost contact at 13:15 and crashed at 13:21, then unlikely it was
shot and could still fly for about 5 minutes, then only fell to the ground in less
than 1 minute time.
Doubt 18. After the black boxes sent to
UK for analysis, it was said data have been downloaded, and then returned to
Netherlands for data analysis, isn’t it an indication that UK is not fond to
commit directly or bear the responsibility of their finding, or something not
right about the initial speculation
that missile shooting down the
aircraft?
Doubt 19. After a few days, there is no
indication that the Netherlands is
ready to disclose their findings, so have to wait until the Malaysia’s Prime Minister to visit
Netherlands on 31 July. However, nothing
was announced about their discovery from the black boxes yet, it seems to become highly confidential
until the preliminary report is
submitted to ICAO, otherwise something
is not right?
Doubt 20. In the last few days, there
was diminishing sound from the government authorities of Netherlands, Malaysia,
UK and Australia who were previously
claiming the MH17 was shot down by missile. It now seems that nobody is absolutely sure, do you still believe
it was shot down by a missile?
Doubt 21. International media reported
in the late July (28 July), Time: “Explosive
decompression happens when the air inside an aircraft depressurizes at an
extremely fast rate, with results similar to a bomb detonation”. The Telegraph: “MH17 suffered a massive
decompression caused by an explosion according to data recovered from the
Malaysian plane's black box recorders”. If the decompression was a result of
missile explosive shrapnel punched on the aircraft fuselage, could the
depressurization be more drastic if compared with a result due to a sudden
internal air pressure build-up?
Doubt 22. For some certain reasons, air
to air strike on the aircraft is unlikely to be the fact. If it was surface
(ground) to air missile strike, you must think of what kind of result it should be, when explosive directly hit on aircraft it should give the first explosion, should a second explosion due
to its fuel follow immediately and occur in the air? However, based on the
video recorded, the tremendous explosion occurred on the ground, which was heavily combustive and smoky,
more likely due to fuel explosion.
Doubt 23. There was another speculation thought that the
missile did not hit right on the aircraft, but exploded at several metres away
from it, the shrapnel that led the aircraft to disintegration, but, how come no
shrapnel hit on the fuel tank and cause explosion in the air?
Doubt 24. Fuel is the most flammable
material in the aircraft, if it burns into fire, there should be obviously
visible of smoke trails when the aircraft coming down from the air, but it is
not seen in the video. Isn’t it strange?
Doubt 25. Although it was not clearly elaborated what was meant by “decompression”,
it could mean for a closed system there was a drop in air pressure due to
leakage, or, more serious one could mean an outside force (such as missile
explosive) breaking the closed system and lead to escaping of air, there is
another situation that cannot be rejected without evidence, when there is a
tremendous build-up of air pressure in the closed system until it cannot
sustain the pressure anymore, the system will burst and decompression occurs. Which
one is relevant to the MH17?
Doubt 26. It was reported that on 12 August, the spokesman for the Dutch
Safety Board (OVV), Wim van der Weegen said: “We have sufficient information to
compile a preliminary report”, “We hope that it will be ready in a few weeks”. He
then said on 13 August that, the preliminary report for the MH17
incident will be released in the first week of September. Although reason was
given, for violating the standard
practice of releasing preliminary report within one month, but whatever
evidence and data obtained so far should be more than sufficient to present a
preliminary report, so that nobody will buy time to set up something, otherwise
there could be some shocking findings about the aircraft crash, the most
stunning one is not “it was not
shot down”.
Doubt 27. Another even more strange
thing is, people expected some news about black box data after the visit of
Malaysia Prime Minister to the Netherlands on 31 July, but there was no, and after about the third day of visit,
there was no more media report about his public appearance. Then, 1 or 2 days
after Australia Prime Minister visited the Netherlands on 12 August, Dutch
Safety Board announced the release
of preliminary report will be deferred to September. Are you able to sense something not right?
Doubt 28. On 10 August, the Malaysian New Sunday Times
reported the debris dispersal over the war zone area near the Hrabove. For
fragment No. 16, it is the rear passenger cabin “right side” with its door
missing, can this door be found and be a clue for the incident?
Doubt 29. Based on the scattering pattern of the
aircraft debris, some fuselage parts were thrown farthest on the ground, not
the cockpit and front parts, unlikely it was shot and immediately disintegrated
while travelling at 900 km/h at 30,000 feet. Can this not suggesting it was
shot while travelling towards the east?
Doubt 30. Instead, can it suggest that when the
aircraft was disintegrating, it was plunging straight or toppled down, so that
the front parts were on the west side while the central parts on the east side?
Doubt 31. Based on the scattering coverage area, is it
likely that the aircraft disintegrated at lower altitude such as about 10,000
feet rather than 30,000 feet?
Doubt 32. Have the investigators absolutely sure what
happen to the MH17 and MH370 are not similar at all? The whole world people and
experts initially thought they are completely different, but I always see
things entirely different.
Doubt 33. Among the 19 major wreckage fragments
illustrated, mostly were not burned into flame, the largest fragment No. 12 is
the centre structure together with fuel tanks and engines, shouldn’t this be
the only one that caught into fire when it smashed on the ground?
Doubt 34. Since most of the debris fragments were not
burned, if they were stained with specific missile explosive residues, then it
could confirm missile shooting, otherwise, can it be not shot by missile?
Doubt 35. You may imagine what could be the situations
where an explosion does not lead to serious combustion, such as, internal high
pressure build-up?
疑点35. 你可能会想像会是什么情况一个爆炸没有导致严重的燃烧, 例如,
内部压力增大?
Doubt 36. A jumbo aircraft, broke up into many pieces
in the air, and scattered on ground in a large area, only few pieces are said
seen to be punched by missile explosive shrapnel, so, isn’t it unlikely missile
exploded outside the aircraft?
Doubt 37. Otherwise, if a missile hit directly on the
aircraft and punched into its fuselage, followed by explosion inside the
aircraft, then explosive residues should have dispersed on the debris, has the
investigation found any of such residues?
Doubt 38. If no explosive residues were found, the
investigation has to consider another situation, can it be an internal
explosion?
疑点38. 如果没有找到爆炸物残渣, 调查就须考虑另一个情况, 它可能是一个内部爆炸吗?
Doubt 39. Consider an air-tight closed system, when it
is under high air pressure, especially under hyperoxia condition, will it possible
subject to thermal explosion or “pressure-metal fatigue” explosion? Could such
explosions be less combustive, but mainly break up the system into many pieces?
Doubt 40. In the past few days, the authorities had discussed
about arrangement to go back to the crash site to look for more evidence and
investigation. What else to look for if they couldn’t find any explosive
residue? If they could find a door or some more bodies westerly farther from
the crash site, then would it be new shocking evidence?
(2)
Although I hope it will not be
another incident, but on 23 August, a
MAS flight MH70 from Kuala Lumpur to Tokyo’s Narita Airport, departed at 10:50
am and turned back after about 50 minutes, it was said that the pilot indicated
some problem. Luckily it was safely landed at KLIA. Still hope that it will not be another such
incident.
Doubt 41. In later media reports, it was said that: “It
was not able to maintain the right pressure differential for the comfort of the
passengers”. Air pressure problem can be big, can be small. Have any of the
investigators for the MH17 and MH370 incidents thought of the possibility of
air pressure factors?
Doubt 42. The similarity between MH17 and MH370: they
are Boeing 777-200ER aircrafts, belong to Malaysia Airlines. If “MH370 burned
into fireball in the air” had been denied, how can “MH17 burst into fragments
in the air” not be denied? All because there was no evidence in the way their
investigation was carried out, however, realization will come much later.
Doubt 43. 6 Weeks after the crash of MH17, the
preliminary report is not yet released. The Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei
Lavrov, queried on 25 August why the recordings from the plane’s black boxes
had not been released publicly, thinking that nothing is transparent. This is
doubtful that the investigation is stalled, especially could be so if they
couldn’t find any explosive residue evidence. He also said that those who had
initially accused the Russia and the Russia-backed Ukrainian rebels shot down
the plane had now fallen silent and “seemed to have swallowed their tongues”.
Isn’t this an indication the investigators have no evidence that the MH17 was
shot by a missile? If it isn’t, the investigation must release the preliminary
report even earlier but not delay till first week of September, it is their
responsibility to prevent any unforeseen new incident.
Doubt 44. It is now the end of first week of
September, the preliminary report for MH17 incident has not been released as
previously announced, yet it was said that will be released next week, another
media source said in this month (September), can you guess why? A preliminary
report should present the raw data including original records of voice
communications from the black box and air traffic control centres, the actual
reasons and cause of the crash is not a must at this stage, unless they found
that the aircraft initially said to be shot down by a missile but now doesn’t
seem to be the only true cause?
Doubt 45. Why does the Dutch Safety Board announce it
will release the interim report on next Tuesday (9 September), that is, only after
confirmed the visit of Malaysian representatives to the Netherlands and Ukraine
next Sunday and Monday? What do they want to verify with the information from
Malaysia that they do not have, but crucial for them to determine the cause of
the crash of MH17? Well, you may guess the management and maintenance records.
Doubt 46. In a local newspaper report (8 September),
the Malaysia Inspector General of Police and the Attorney General are now in
the Netherlands (7 September). You must be very curious, it may be the reason
for the delay of the preliminary report? Why does the aircraft crash
investigation in the Netherlands got to do with the police in Malaysia? What can
you guess now? What do investigators want to cross-check or confirm with? There
must be some very crucial internal investigation. You may agree that, to arrest
and charge culprits from Ukraine or Russia does not seem to be viable. Will the
preliminary report be not stunning the world? Tomorrow will see the answer.
Doubt 47. On 9 October, the Dutch foreign minister
Frans Timmermans said, an Australian passenger of MH17 aircraft, was found to
have oxygen mask around the neck, this is a shocking revelation, because expert
analysis speculated that victims died within seconds after the aircraft was
thought shot by a missile. Is it true that victims had time to put on oxygen
mask? Is it contradicts with the theory of missile shooting that brought down
the aircraft?
